BACK TO PROJECT LIST

Analysis of Biotic and Abiotic Factors in Human-Altered Environments:

Rice Fields, Cattle Grazed Marsh, and Marsh Cattle Exclusionary Zone

 

Back to the Classroom     Rubric    Table 1    Bibiliography    Appendix

Sheila Smith Terry High School, Terry, MS

Judy Reeves

Denise Gordon Applied Learning Academy, Fort Worth, TX

Virginia Vilardi

July 28, 2001

 

Introduction:    There is degradation of water quality associated with habitat destruction and increasing human development. This degradation may be manifested in increased levels of nitrates, nitrites, phosphates, metals such as copper, or sediment levels due to fertilizer and/or pesticide use, irrigation, and changes in land use. (LaMotte 1999). An increase in temperature or changes in pH in an area are also indicators of pollution, particularly in association with changes in presence or abundance of indicator organisms (Cook,1999). In addition many of man’s activities increase the turbidity of the water. Rice field irrigation, flooding, and application of fertilizers and pesticides create an artificial wetland with a chemical soup (Allen, 1999). Rice farmers cultivate their fields by replacing the back wheels of their tractors with large angle iron paddle wheels, effectively crushing vegetation into the mud (McCoy, 1994). Changes would be expected in water chemistry parameters as well as loss of biodiversity of organisms at every level, including microorganisms.

Cattle grazing was eliminated in the fresh water marsh at Palo Verde in 1980 when it became a wildlife refuge. Almost immediately cattail (Typha dominguensis) invaded and covered the marsh, eliminating much of the habitat for the sixty plus species of resident and migratory waterfowl, which used the marsh (McCoy, 1994). Since 1987, limited grazing of cattle combined with burning, digging, and crushing of cattails has been instituted in an attempt to restore the marsh. There are now more open areas in the marsh populated by floating vegetation. Small areas were fenced to exclude cattle to provide control areas in the marsh. In addition 10-meter square plots of cattails were left standing in the cattle areas to provide biodiversity, edge effect, and to protect the delicate sedges, which don’t recover after crushing.

We theorized that there would be differences in water chemistry and species richness of microorganisms (mainly protists and algae) between cultivated rice fields, cattail marshes, and marsh areas with mainly floating vegetation, even though each environment is a product of man’s activities.

Hypothesis

Since each of these sites has been subjected to environmental degradation, evidence of compromised water quality should be evident. (lower pH, higher temperature, higher conductivity, presence of nitrates, and lower dissolved oxygen). Rice fields, because they are cultivated and subjected to chemical treatment, were expected to be worse than the marsh areas. In addition, the monoculture of the rice field was expected to depress biodiversity. T. dominguensis areas of the marsh, because of its quality of invasiveness (quick growing, prolific, etc.) should be more productive and show higher dissolved oxygen values (Windham, 1996). Cattle exclusionary areas should show some improvement in dissolved oxygen values compared to cattle grazing areas.

Materials:

CBL with probes for DO, Temperature, & Conductivity

Collecting vials        Nitrate test strips         PH test strips         Microscope         Slides         Proto-slow         Pipette

 

Methods:

  1. Sites for testing were determined.
Click on thumbnail to see enlarged image
a.  Cultivated Rice Field – 4 replicate samples were taken at each site
b.  Drainage Ditch next to rice field – 4 replicate samples were taken at each site.
c.  Cattle grazing area dominated by cattails (Typha dominguensis)
d.  Cattle grazing area dominated by water lilies (Nymphaea spp.)
e.  Cattle exclusionary area dominated by cattails (T. dominguensis)
f.  Cattle exclusionary area dominated by water lilies (Nymphaea spp.)
  1. CBL equipment including Dissolved Oxygen (DO), conductivity, and temperature probes were collected and calibrated.
  2. Researchers traveled to rice field site and to the marsh for data collection.
  3. CBL probes for DO, conductivity, and temperature were used as well as pH and nitrate/nitrite dip sticks.
  4. Researchers collected water samples for later investigation at the lab.
  5. Observational data were recorded.
  6. Researchers examined samples with a microscope for protists and algae.
  7. Data recorded and analyzed.

Results: Air temperature (Figure 1) was measured in order to calculate % saturation of dissolved oxygen. No difference between water temperature and air temperature were found. Water depth and water temperature were not significantly different from site to site. (see figure 2 & Figure 3). pH was consistently 7.5 in the rice field and environs, which is within the normal range. In the marsh, a pH of 9 was consistent across all sites, indicating very basic (alkaline) water conditions (see figure 4) Nitrates and Nitrites values were negligible (see Data Table Appendix A). Dissolved Oxygen values showed differences between the rice plantations & marsh sites, above normal values of oxygen saturation in the rice plantation and very low values for all marsh areas (see figure 5). Conductivity values were within normal range (250mg/l for lakes and streams) at the rice plantation and very high for the marsh areas (see figure 6). A microorganism species richness was greater in the marsh, as were their relative numbers (See Table 1).

Figure1: Air Temperature Figure 2: Water Temperature Figure 3: Water Depth
Figure 4: average pH Figure 5: %Oxygen Saturation Figure 6: Conductivity

Discussion:  Water quality values in the rice fields and environs were different from the marsh areas in terms of pH, dissolved oxygen values and total dissolved solids TDS (conductivity). Yet, the rice field values are more inline to the accepted normal values for U.S. streambeds (LaMotte, 1999). The marsh pH was very high (out of range) for many fresh water organisms to live in. The accepted pH range should be between 6.5-8.2 (LaMotte, 1999). The conductivity was very high due to the mixture of the salty Tempisque Rivers tide. In irrigation crops total values of dissolved solids lie between 175-500. A reading above 1500 is considered to be high (LaMotte, 1999) the marshes dissolved oxygen values were extremely low, even though the marsh vegetation was photosynthesizing. Minimum oxygen levels for fish and frogs are considered to be greater than 5 ppm DO. In fact, we did not see any minnows or frogs in the marsh water, as we did in the irrigation ditch. In the marsh the DO was low which was probably influenced by the rotting vegetation or the floating animal fecal material, which uses oxygen in the decomposition process. However, there was no foul odor in the water. Only one of the rice sites had a nitrogen reading while the other tested areas had a zero value for nitrate/ nitrite values. We expected this value to be high in the rice fields and run of ditch because of fertilizer application and high in the marsh because of cattle waste defecation. Due to the fact that the rice had already been harvested , may explain why the nitrogen levels were lower than expected. Nitrogen fertilizers are added at the beginning of the growing season or in pulses throughout. Expected differences between cattail areas (T. dominguensis) and floating aquatic vegetation (Nymphaea spp.) were not evident, which may reflect sampling size or the overwhelming oxygen demand of decomposition. Biodiversity in the marsh areas as measured by species richness and relative numbers in microorganisms was greater than the rice fields. However, macro organism indicators were not studied. Besides the lack of fish and frogs, a far greater number of waterfowl, many which eat the macro invertebrates, were observed at the rice plantation. High diversity could have been influenced by the nitrites presence in the water. Overall the rice plantation is a managed enterprise seen in this limited sampling to be a healthier environment for aquatic organisms rather than the marsh area.