Click
here to return to main page
A Comparison of Soils from
Two Diverse Wetland Areas
in the Tempisque Watershed
By Dee Ann Wilson, Michelle Breinholt , Christopher
Soldat and Ken Harasty.
In conducting this study
our objectives were to determine the effects of human alteration and
interaction on soils. This study
compares a rice field to the soil of an existing wetland. Our comparison was based on a short chemical
analysis of soil and a survey of existing macroinvertebrates. We found that there were no significant
differences between the two study sites.
Introduction: Recent
information says that, “ between one-half and one-third of the land surface (of
the Earth) has been transformed by human interaction.” (Vitousek, Mooney, Lubchenco and Melillo,
1997). Human agricultural activities in
Guanacaste province Costa Rica have altered the primary forest. Initially forests were cleared for cattle
production and grazing. Subsequently
pastureland has been converted to rice production. In rice production, herbicides and fertilizers are used, the
fields are flooded two to three times and the water is allowed to slowly
drain. Farmers in Guanacaste yield two
crops a year.
We
believed that natural wetland soil would contain greater population numbers and
diversity of macroinvertebrates than the cultivated soil of a rice field. We have witnessed similar bird species
feeding in both rice field and wetlands.
Many of these species sieve macroinvertebrates from the soil with their
specialized beaks.
This
study is a comparison of the soils of a nearby rice field to a protected
wetland area inside the Palo Verde National Park. We were interested in determining if rice production and the use
of land-applied chemicals has altered the soils from the wetlands inside a
protected park.
Materials and Methods:
Collection materials- PVC soil
collection pipe, tape measure, bucket, six ziplock bags, rubber boots/hip waders,
GPS location device, digital camera and a permanent marker.
Data sampling materials- balance
beam, sieve, bowls, forceps, probes, wash bottles, hand lenses, plastic vials,
soil test kit, hammer, petri dishes, and filter paper.
Diversity and Population Count
Procedures:
Results:
Data Table 1
|
Rice Sample |
Species name And number |
Species name And number |
|
Rice- 1 meter |
65 bloodworms |
1 mollusk species |
|
Rice- 2 meters |
220 bloodworms |
|
|
Rice- 3 meters |
144 bloodworms |
|
|
total |
429 bloodworms |
1 mollusk species |
Average
430/3= 143 per sample
Data Table 2
Wetland sample |
Species name And number |
Species name And number |
|
Wetland- 1 meter |
120 bloodworms |
2 arthropods |
|
Wetland- 2 meters |
44 bloodworms |
1 arthropods |
|
Wetland- 3 meters |
8 bloodworms |
1 arthropods |
|
total |
172 bloodworms |
4 arthropods |
Average
172/3= 57 per sample
GPS reading: 10 degrees 20.92’N, 85 degrees 6’ W
|
Sample |
pH |
nitrogen |
phosphorus |
potassium |
|
Rice field |
7 |
no |
high |
Medium low |
|
Wetlands |
7 |
no |
high |
high |
These tables indicated that the rice fields had a higher average number of macro-invertebrates than the wetland field. The chemical analysis of the soils proved to be identical except for a small difference in the potassium level.
Summary:
Our
conclusion indicates that there is no significant difference in diversity
between the soil samples at the two tested sites. The higher number of organisms in the rice field sample would
seem to show that human impact has not unusually altered that environment. Chemical composition tests do not show any
unusual levels of soil parameters either.
We feel that future study should include a larger number of related
sample sites. We feel that it is important to utilize soil chemistry test
equipment, which provide qualitative as well as quantitative results. Also, we feel that it would be important to
continue to investigate the quality of life by including microorganisms in the
next investigation as well.

Educational Applications:
Most
classrooms can identify wetlands within their own watersheds, which are close to
human use areas such as farms, housing developments or commercial
interests. These areas in students’
home communities are excellent study areas.
They provide a natural area where students can begin inquiry activities
to determine the connections between human use practices and the natural
landscape. Students can begin to
collect data to help determine facts concerning environmental issues. It is a
good learning experience which helps integrate school and learning into a more
authentic experience.
Click
here to return to main page