Click here to return to main page

 

A Comparison of Soils from Two Diverse Wetland Areas

in the Tempisque Watershed

By Dee Ann Wilson, Michelle Breinholt , Christopher Soldat and Ken Harasty.

 

 

 

 

 
 

Abstract

            In conducting this study our objectives were to determine the effects of human alteration and interaction on soils.   This study compares a rice field to the soil of an existing wetland.  Our comparison was based on a short chemical analysis of soil and a survey of existing macroinvertebrates.  We found that there were no significant differences between the two study sites.

 

Introduction:  Recent information says that, “ between one-half and one-third of the land surface (of the Earth) has been transformed by human interaction.”  (Vitousek, Mooney, Lubchenco and Melillo, 1997).  Human agricultural activities in Guanacaste province Costa Rica have altered the primary forest.  Initially forests were cleared for cattle production and grazing.  Subsequently pastureland has been converted to rice production.  In rice production, herbicides and fertilizers are used, the fields are flooded two to three times and the water is allowed to slowly drain.  Farmers in Guanacaste yield two crops a year.  

We believed that natural wetland soil would contain greater population numbers and diversity of macroinvertebrates than the cultivated soil of a rice field.  We have witnessed similar bird species feeding in both rice field and wetlands.  Many of these species sieve macroinvertebrates from the soil with their specialized beaks. 

This study is a comparison of the soils of a nearby rice field to a protected wetland area inside the Palo Verde National Park.   We were interested in determining if rice production and the use of land-applied chemicals has altered the soils from the wetlands inside a protected park.

 

Materials and Methods:

Collection materials- PVC soil collection pipe, tape measure, bucket, six ziplock bags, rubber boots/hip waders, GPS location device, digital camera and a permanent marker.

Data sampling materials- balance beam, sieve, bowls, forceps, probes, wash bottles, hand lenses, plastic vials, soil test kit, hammer, petri dishes, and filter paper.

 

Collection Procedures:

Soil Chemistry Procedures:

Diversity and Population Count Procedures:

Results:

Data Table 1

Rice Sample

Species name

And number

Species name

And number

Rice- 1 meter

65 bloodworms

1 mollusk species

Rice- 2 meters

220 bloodworms

 

Rice- 3 meters

144 bloodworms

 

total

429 bloodworms

1 mollusk species

Average 430/3= 143 per sample

GPS reading: 10 degrees 25’ N, 85 degrees 18’ W

Data Table 2                       

Wetland sample

Species name

And number

Species name

 

And number

Wetland- 1 meter

120 bloodworms

2 arthropods

Wetland- 2 meters

 44 bloodworms

1 arthropods

Wetland- 3 meters

  8 bloodworms

1 arthropods

total

172 bloodworms

4 arthropods

Average 172/3= 57 per sample

GPS reading: 10 degrees 20.92’N, 85 degrees 6’ W    

Data Table 3

 

Sample

pH

nitrogen

phosphorus

potassium

Rice field

7

no

high

Medium low

Wetlands

7

no

high

high

 

 

These tables indicated that the rice fields had a higher average number of macro-invertebrates than the wetland field.  The chemical analysis of the soils proved to be identical except for a small difference in the potassium level.

 

Summary:

            Our conclusion indicates that there is no significant difference in diversity between the soil samples at the two tested sites.  The higher number of organisms in the rice field sample would seem to show that human impact has not unusually altered that environment.  Chemical composition tests do not show any unusual levels of soil parameters either.  We feel that future study should include a larger number of related sample sites. We feel that it is important to utilize soil chemistry test equipment, which provide qualitative as well as quantitative results.  Also, we feel that it would be important to continue to investigate the quality of life by including microorganisms in the next investigation as well.

Text Box:

Educational Applications:

            Most classrooms can identify wetlands within their own watersheds, which are close to human use areas such as farms, housing developments or commercial interests.  These areas in students’ home communities are excellent study areas.  They provide a natural area where students can begin inquiry activities to determine the connections between human use practices and the natural landscape.    Students can begin to collect data to help determine facts concerning environmental issues. It is a good learning experience which helps integrate school and learning into a more authentic experience.

 

Click here to return to main page