Click here to return to main page

 

The Species Richness and Abundance of Macroinvertebrates Existing Within the Inflorescence of Heliconia imbricata at Two Different Sites in La Selva Biological Reserve, Costa Rica

 

Jennifer Huntsberger, Ken Mukai, Ronald Rushing, Teri Sheldahl, Jewel Thornton

 

ABSTRACT

Heliconia imbricata is a large colorful plant that occurs in disturbed and secondary growth areas of the rainforest in La Selva Biological Reserve, Costa Rica.  The bracts of each inflorescence support a wide variety of invertebrates in the liquid that is retained there.  We decided to study the microecosystem within each inflorescence to see if a difference exists in abundance and species richness of macroinvertebrates in separate habitats.  Three flowers were collected from separate plants in two different habitats: a secondary forest along a trail and an area around a soccer field.  Flowers were assayed for liquid volume and pH of the liquid within the bracts and macroinvertebrates were separated and counted.  There was a definitive difference in macroinvertebrates between the two sites.  There were many more dipterans including mosquito larvae in those flowers collected near the soccer field than in those collected from secondary forest.  The average Shannon-Weaver Diversity Index for the secondary forest was much higher than that of the soccer field area, which may be an indicator of general ecosystem health.

 

INTRODUCTION

     Heliconia imbricata is one of twelve species of Heliconia plants existing within the forest ecosystem of La Selva Biological Reserve.  The primary forest along the Sarapiqui plains have been indiscriminately and rapidly altered due to domestic and foreign socioeconomic and political pressures (Janzen 1983). Heliconia growth is linked to the availability of light as well as to areas of second growth (McDade 1944). 

     The Heliconia is a large-leaved monocotyledon occurring in disturbed areas of the tropical rainforest.  It develops a brilliant, red inflorescence with boat-shaped bracts spirally arranged around a rachis.  The bracts serve as a reservoir to collect water and contain a microecosystem including numerous invertebrates.  The microecosystems within the bracts may have been severely altered by human activity; therefore, we developed a study to investigate that possibility.  Our study is designed to see if a difference exists in the abundance and the species richness of the invertebrates present in the flowers of two different areas of disturbance within the La Selva Reserve.   

 

PROCEDURE

Heliconia imbricata flowers were obtained from two locations within La Selva Biological Reserve during a downpour of rain.  Three samples were made from the understory of a 50 year old secondary forest along the Sendero Tres Rios Trail near markers 250, 750,  and 900. Three other samples were taken along the border of a regularly cleared out soccer field and pathway that is immediately below the OTS office and cafeteria.  The soccer field was cleared away approximately 10-15 years ago. Flowers that were 1.5 to 2 meters tall and having an approximate lower bract count of 10 – 14 buds were cut off immediately below the bottom bract.  The terminal buds for all selected flowers were still closed and intact.  Flowers were bagged, cut from their stalk and turned upside down to collect all water within the floral bracts.  Floral samples were taken to the OTS field laboratory where they were dissected and assayed for macroinvertebrates.  Organisms were separated into petri dishes, identified with a dissecting microscope and inventoried for species richness and abundance.

 

RESULTS

Data

Class Insecta

Order Coleoptera

 

Unknown A

Unknown B

Unknown C

Unknown D

Unknown E

Unknown F

Disturbed 1

3

2

0

5

0

2

Disturbed 2

4

3

0

5

0

4

Disturbed 3

13

6

0

18

0

1

Secondary Forest 1

8

1

4

0

0

0

Secondary Forest 2

9

7

0

0

1

0

Secondary Forest 3

14

2

2

0

1

0

 

Order Diptera

 

Unknown A

Unknown B

Unknown C

Mosquito Larva

Disturbed 1

26

0

2

82

Disturbed 2

48

13

1

0

Disturbed 3

94

0

2

206

Secondary Forest 1

28

5

0

2

Secondary Forest 2

2

7

0

1

Secondary Forest 3

16

1

0

6

 

Order Hymenoptera

 

Unknown A

Unknown B

Unknown C

Unknown D

Disturbed 1

2

2

4

0

Disturbed 2

0

0

0

0

Disturbed 3

7

4

0

2

Secondary Forest 1

0

0

0

0

Secondary Forest 2

2

0

0

0

Secondary Forest 3

0

0

0

0

Ken with Heliconia imbricata.


 

Miscellaneous Unknown Arthropods, Mollusks and annelids

 

Unknown

Isopoda A

Unknown

Diplopoda A

Unknown

Arachnida A

Unknown

Arachnida B

Unknown

Molluska A

Unknown

Annelida A

Disturbed 1

1

0

0

0

0

0

Disturbed 2

2

1

0

0

0

0

Disturbed 3

0

0

0

0

0

1

Secondary Forest 1

4

0

0

0

1

0

Secondary Forest 2

0

0

1

0

0

0

Secondary Forest 3

0

0

0

1

0

0

 

 

Heliconia Bract Solution Measurements

 

Volume of Fluid in Bracts (mL)

pH of Solution

Disturbed 1

156

7.5

Disturbed 2

131

6.0

Disturbed 3

306

7.0

Secondary Forest 1

195

7.0

Secondary Forest 2

266

7.0

Secondary Forest 3

244

7.0

Teri and Jewel dissecting an inflorescence.


 


Shannon-Weaver Diversity Index

 

n

k

J’

Average J’

Disturbed 1

131

11

.54

 

Disturbed 2

81

9

.63

.48

Disturbed 3

354

11

.25

 

Secondary Forest 1

53

8

.73

 

Secondary Forest 2

30

8

.88

.77

Secondary Forest 3

43

8

.75

 

n = total number of organisms in sample

k = number of different species in sample

H’ = (n log n – S fi log fi)/n

H’max = log k

J’ = H’/H’ max

 

Jennifer and Ron counting organisms.


 

DATA ANALYSIS

There is a variety of life supported by Heliconia floral bracts. Individuals of three different orders of Insecta were found and other invertebrates including two different spiders, a snail, and an annelid.  The volume of water in each inflorescence probably varies with the number of bracts present and amount of rain.   In our samples the water collected from similar sized inflorescences was between 130 mL and 306 mL and they were collected during a large downpour.  The pH is generally around 7.0 with a notable exception in the Disturbed 2 area, which had a pH of 6.0. The volume of this sample was the lowest collected (131 mL).

 

We did find a difference in macroinvertebrates present in the two sites.  There was a much larger number of dipterans including mosquito larvae in those flowers collected from around the soccer field than in those collected from the secondary forest trail.  One notable exception is the secondary forest sample 2,  which was collected close to the river, with a pH of 6,  had no mosquito larvae. The pH may have inhibited the dipteran growth and development and would certainly be worth another look.

 

A Shannon-Weaver Diversity Index was carried out to give us some idea of the species richness and evenness within each inflorescence.  The closer this index number is to 1, the more diverse and even the species abundance, which are indicators of ecosystem health.  We did find a large difference in species richness and abundance between the two areas.  The disturbed area around the soccer field had an average value of .48 while the secondary forest treatment area along the trail had an average index of .77.  These numbers indicate that the secondary forest Heliconia floral bract microecosystems are ecologically healthier with a greater species evenness and diversity than those within the floral bracts from the disturbed area.

 

Biodiversity refers to genetic, species, and ecosystem diversity. Biodiversity stabilizes ecosystems and strengthens their ability to recover from damage. The different diversity indices of the Heliconia bract microecosytems could reflect a greater stability of the secondary forest ecosystem versus that of the disturbed area around the soccer field.

 

While we are confident that our results represent a definite trend, there are some consideration that would help researchers in the future conduct a better study.

 

CLASSROOM APPLICATIONS

Conduct similar surveys of plant species that are reservoirs of invertebrates to:

·        Model ecosystem dynamics such as food webs and biodiversity

·        Develop taxonomy skills

·        Study metamorphosis and invertebrate life cycles

·        Compare macroinvertebrates within the same plant species in disturbed and undisturbed areas as indicators of global environmental change

·        Model inquiry processes in a cooperative learning environment

·        Conduct data analysis

 

 

ENDNOTES

Janzen, Daniel H.  1983.  Costa Rica Natural History.  University of Chicago Press.

 

McDade,  Lucinda A,  Kamaljit S. Bawa, et.al.  1994. LaSelva:Ecology and Natural History of Newtropical rain Forest;  University of Chicago Press,  Chicago.

 

Zar,  Jerrolod H.  1999.  Biostatistical Analysis.  4th Edition.  Prentice Hall,  New Jersey.

 

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to thank Evan Notman and Senor OrlandoVargas for their help with the biology and location of  our Heliconia samples. 

 

 

Click here to return to main page