![]() |
![]() |
Comparison of Biotic Factors: Biodiversity, Productivity, Benthic
Cores, And Abiotic Factors: Temperature, pH
Among Two Locations in the Palo Verde Lagoon and One Location in the Quebrada Mula Wetland in Palo Verde National Park
Submitted by: Hal Groeneboer, Mary Moreira, Carol Paine, Stacy Weaver
The Palo Verde lagoon is on the floodplain of the Tempisque River. It is bounded by the river on the south and by limestone hills on the other sides. "The lowland areas between the hills and the wetland are composed mainly of montmorillonite clay with 2 x 2 lattice structure of the clay micelles which permits considerable incorporation of water molecules during the wet season and a substantial dry season loss of water." (Jansen, p. 131) During cattle ranching times, an opening was made between the lagoon and the river which allowed continual exchange of water between the river and the wetland, especially during the wet season. The river drains numerous rice fields along its route and as a result carries much sediment and agricultural chemicals. When the park was set up, the opening between the river and the lagoon was closed. At present, the main sources of water entering the lagoon are rainfall and runoff from the higher areas, primarily forested areas on the limestone cliffs. However, there is still flooding on a regular basis (usually at high tides) about 12-18 times per year. All areas of the lagoon seemed to have consistent water levels of about 0.5 to 0.7 meters within 10 meters of the edge.
Two areas in the lagoon were surveyed. One is being invaded by Typha dominguensis (cattails) which is becoming the dominant plant in that area. The other area, while not open water, is covered by primarily low growing species, also invasive – primarily Eeichhornia crassipes (water hyacinth), Nymphaea ampla (a water lily with small, rounded leaves) and another water lily having larger leaves with toothed margins. There are mangrove areas along the river bank and an area of Parkinsoniia aculeata (palo verde tree) in a parallel band between the mangroves and the lagoon.
The Quebrada Mula site, in addition to rainfall, run off from surrounding areas, and much less frequent river flooding, could also be fed by surface water (quebrada means small stream) although this is not documented. It is bisected by a concrete bridge and a filled in road area, with a narrow, 4.5 meter opening between them. Under and on both sides of the bridge, as well as one other small area, there was open water, probably indicating deeper water (>2 meters). The water level in the marsh varied between very shallow (15-20 cm) to water probably over our heads. This wetland had numerous areas with significantly different characteristic vegetation. Some areas were covered in primarily low growing floating vegetation while others had tall grasses and arrowroot.
The park management has concerns that the invasive species found in
the wetland areas are decreasing the biodiversity which could eventually
limit the ability of the wetland to maintain a healthy ecosystem.
In Quebrada Mula, because there was a large difference in depth
accompanied by a wide difference in type of dominant vegetation, we chose
to use 4 separate 1 square meter plots. The procedure here was basically
identical to that followed at the other side.
Plant identification was done at the OTS station from various books
and articles which listed vegetation found in these wetland areas.
Temperature was measured by placing the thermometer about 1 cm below
the surface of the water and about 1 cm above the substrate. The thermometer
remained at each position for about 2 minutes.
Sagittaria guyanensis 17 Water plaintain
Aeschynomone sensitiva 9 Pinnately compound leaf, small yellow flowers, floating white rope like, tuberous main root surrounded by mats of hair roots.
Nymphaea ampla 8 Small leafed, smooth edged white flowered water lily Grass A 50-60 Segmented grass with alternating leaves, reddish stem, 30 cm. above water, long underwater stems
Pistia stratiotes about 200 Small duckweed
Floating plant A 2 Water lettuce
Eleocharis mutata or 5 Sedge (triangular stalk), no seeds or Cyperus articulatus flowers. (found mostly along shore in C. digitatus 15-20 cm water)
Palo Verde – Low vegetation
Eichhornia crassipes 14 Water Hyacinth
Nymphaea ampla 24-30 Small leafed, smooth edged water lily stems and bottom of leaf reddish colored Water lily A 12-25 Larger, toothed edged lily with typical white Paspalum sp. < 5% Grass (Phillipe identified)
Potomogeton sp. <5% Fern like aquatic plant (seaweed)
Aeschynomone sensitiva 9 Pinnately compound leaf, small yellow flowers, floating white rope like, tuberous main root surrounded by mats of hair roots.
Minute yellow flower on 5-6 cm stalk with no leaves, rooted in floating
roots of other plants
Quebrada Mula (4 separate 1 meter square lots)
We found Canna lutea (canna lily) in the wetland, but not in the area surveyed.
Eichhornia crassipes 100 Water Hyacinth
Grass A 50 Segmented grass with alternating leaves, Reddish stem,
30 cm. above water, long underwater stems
? 570 Fuzzy leafed (similar to Venus Flytrap), clumped with root
ball, floating plants
Pistia stratiotes <1% Small duckweed
? 60 Floating seaweek (milfoil) type plant
Grass C 16 Sharp leafed, light green segmented grass
Grass D 23 Sharp leafed, dark green, segmented grass
Grass E 37 Hairy leafed and stem, medium green segmented grass
Mimosa pigra? 2 Herbaceous, thorned mimosa type legume
? 6 Water lettuce
? 10 Fuzzy deeply lobed palmate leafed, tall (1 m.) single stemmed,
herbaceous plant
Vine with trifoliate leaf
Plants supposedly found in the lagoon (Crow), but unidentified by
us are: Ludwigia inclinata, Najas guadalupensis, Nymphaea prolifera,
Heteranthera limosa, Bacopa repens, , Neptunia plena, Paspalidium germinatum
Palo Verde Lagoon – Typha area - 7.6 kg.
Low vegetation 2.7 kg
Quebrada Mula 6.0 kg.
Palo Verde Typha
Core Sample #1
Mollusk #1 4 Small Snail Shells Planaspiral- light brown
Mollusk #2 6 Small fragments - white
Core Sample #2
Mollusk #1 4 Small Snail Shells Planaspiral -light brown
Mollusk #2 8 fragments -white
Core Sample #3
Mollusk #1 1 Large Snail Shell Planaspiral, White
Mollusk #2 1 Large Snail Shell Planaspiral Brown
Mollusk #3 6 Small Snail Shells 1 brown, 5 white
Mollusk #4 9 Small White Fragments
Mollusk #5 5 Small Brown Fragments
Core Sample #4
Mollusk #1 1 Large Snail , Planaspiral, Light Brown
Mollusk #2 3 Tiny White Shells Planaspiral
Mollusk #3 12 Shell Fragments -White helispiral
Mollusk #4 3 Shell Fragments Brown helispiral
Mollusk #5 Small white Bivalve
Palo Verde Low Vegetation- Core Sample #1
Mollusk #1 Large Half Snail, planaspiral light brown
Mollusk #2 3 Small Snail 1 helispiral white
2 planasprial light brown
Mollusk #3 Fragments 8 light brown
13 white
brown bivalve
Core Sample #2
Mollusk #1 2 Large Snail Shells both hosting aquatic plant growth
white helispiral
brown striped helispiral
Mollusk #2 2 Small Snail Shells planaspiral 19.0 mm. brown
8.3 mm. White
Mollusk #3 Fragments 3 helispiral brown
27 planaspiral white
Core Sample #3
Mollusk #1 1 Large Snail
Mollusk #2 1 Tiny Snail
Core Sample #4
Mollusk #1 1 Large Snail
Mollusk #2 3 Small Snail
Quebrada Mula
Core Sample #1
No living or dead mollusks were found
Core Sample #2
Mollusk #1 Large large snail Helispiral grey and white - Live
Mollusk #2 Large Snail Shell helispiral brown
Mollusk #3 2 Small Snail Shells helispiral brown
Core Sample #3
No living or dead organisms
Core Sample #4
Mollusk #1 2 Large Snails Striped dark brown and white helispiral - Live
Palo Verge Lagoon – Typha Very Rare Rare Occasional
Low vegetation None Very Rare Rare
Quebrada Mula Occasional Frequent Frequent
(Insect, protist)
Palo Verge Lagoon – Typha 7.5 7.5 8.0
Low vegetation 7/0 7.5 8.5
Quebrada Mula 5.5 5.5 5.5
Low vegetation 31.1 C (88 F) 26.6 C (80 F)
Quebrada Mula 31.1 C(88 F) 26.6 C (80 F) (27.8 C on shallow side)
| Palo Verde Typha | ||||||
| Spp | f | P | plogp | flog^2f | flogf | |
|
1
|
18
|
0.0573248
|
-0.0711778
|
28.362763
|
22.594905
|
|
|
2
|
17
|
0.0541401
|
-0.0685674
|
25.738077
|
20.917632
|
|
|
3
|
9
|
0.0286624
|
-0.0442171
|
8.1952089
|
8.5881826
|
|
|
4
|
8
|
0.0254777
|
-0.0406074
|
6.5245722
|
7.2247199
|
|
|
5
|
55
|
0.1751592
|
-0.1325197
|
166.58743
|
95.719948
|
|
|
6
|
200
|
0.6369427
|
-0.1247768
|
1058.9478
|
460.206
|
|
|
7
|
2
|
0.0063694
|
-0.0139866
|
0.1812381
|
0.60206
|
|
|
8
|
5
|
0.0159236
|
-0.0286299
|
2.4427953
|
3.49485
|
|
| SUM |
314
|
H'--> |
-0.5244828
|
1296.9799
|
619.3483
|
|
| s^2 |
0.0007642
|
|||||
| Ho: H'1 = H'2 | ||||||
| Ha: H'1 NE H'2 | ||||||
| Contrast | s | t | df | p | ||
| PVTvsPVO |
0.0386541
|
6.083321
|
282.07458
|
<0.001 | reject Ho | |
| PVTvsQM |
0.0338445
|
1.1788094
|
648.19504
|
>0.1 | accept Ho | |
| Palo Verde - low-vegetation | ||||||
| f | flog^2f | flogf | ||||
|
14
|
0.1590909
|
-0.127011
|
18.390533
|
16.045792
|
||
|
28
|
0.3181818
|
-0.1582397
|
58.639458
|
40.520425
|
||
|
19
|
0.2159091
|
-0.143737
|
31.069005
|
24.296318
|
||
|
4
|
0.0454545
|
-0.0610192
|
1.4499049
|
2.40824
|
||
|
4
|
0.0454545
|
-0.0610192
|
1.4499049
|
2.40824
|
||
|
9
|
0.1022727
|
-0.1012746
|
8.1952089
|
8.5881826
|
||
|
10
|
0.1136364
|
-0.1073276
|
10
|
10
|
||
|
88
|
H' |
-0.7596281
|
129.19401
|
104.2672
|
||
| s^2 |
0.0007299
|
|||||
| Quebrada Mula | ||||||
| flog^2f | flogf | |||||
|
100
|
0.1129944
|
-0.1069992
|
400
|
200
|
||
|
50
|
0.0564972
|
-0.070507
|
144.32495
|
84.9485
|
||
|
570
|
0.6440678
|
-0.123061
|
4329.0623
|
1570.8487
|
||
|
9
|
0.0101695
|
-0.0202648
|
8.1952089
|
8.5881826
|
||
|
60
|
0.0677966
|
-0.0792401
|
189.70931
|
106.68908
|
||
|
16
|
0.0180791
|
-0.0315087
|
23.198479
|
19.26592
|
||
|
23
|
0.0259887
|
-0.0411977
|
42.648962
|
31.31974
|
||
|
37
|
0.0418079
|
-0.0576423
|
90.992496
|
58.023464
|
||
|
2
|
0.0022599
|
-0.0059795
|
0.1812381
|
0.60206
|
||
|
10
|
0.0112994
|
-0.0219994
|
10
|
10
|
||
|
2
|
0.0022599
|
-0.0059795
|
0.1812381
|
0.60206
|
||
|
879
|
H' |
-0.5643791
|
5238.4942
|
2090.8877
|
||
| s^2 |
0.0003812
|
|||||
The Shannon-Wiener diversity index can be used to compare the distribution of observations among numerous categories. It takes into account both the diversity (types of vegetation in this study) as well as the number of examples of each category (species richness). The diversity value – H’ – is highest with many categories (species) and an even number of examples in each category. In our samples, the Typha area had a diversity index H’ =0.52448 (the absolute value is used), the low vegetation area –H’ = 0.75963, and the Quebrada Mula site was H’= 0.57908. From this index you can see that the low vegetation type has a much larger diversity index, while the other 2 sites (Typha and QM) have almost identical ones.
With the diversity index, H’, we can only make a general statement. In order to test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the diversity at any of the sites, we will use a "t" test to measure the variance between the indices.
First we compared the PV Typha site and the PV low vegetation
site. The calculations are shown on the first chart above. PV-Typha
versus PV low vegetation – t = 6.08 which indicates significance at p<0.001.
PV Typha versus Quebrada Mula – t = 1.63 which does not indicate
significance at p>0.1. Therefore, the low vegetation site in the lagoon
is significantly more diverse than the Typha site in the lagoon-
(Reject null hypothesis that sites are the same). However, the QM site
is not significantly more diverse than the PV Typha site- (Accept
null hypothesis that sites are the same).
As you can see from the data, all of the lagoon samples showed little
to no microorganisms with the bottom of the Typha area showing only
occasional protists. The Quebrada Mula site showed more microorganisms
but the limited sample site does not allow us to draw any conclusions.
The pH testing showed that the QM site was slightly acidic (pH = 5.5at
all levels) and that the lagoon areas were neutral to slightly basic (pH
= 7.0 to 8.5). While this could indicate the presence of dissolved oxygen
in the lagoon, it is much more likely that it reflects the water runoff
from the limestone cliffs, which border the lagoon.
(Note: in a further observation of the Typha dominated area, plant diversity was noted along a 150 meter straight line perpendicular from shore. This observation seemed to show that the Typha dominated area continues to have significant biodiversity. The Typha seems to grow in patches interspersed with significant low vegetation. Within the Typha patches most of the species represented in our 2 x 2 meter plot can be observed in similar proportions. In determining the future growth of Typha and its effect on biodiversity, it would be valuable to know how long the Typha has been present in the lagoon. Is the present state an equilibrium which has been reached among the plants presently found in the lagoon, or will Typha become more widely spread and choke out the other species?
This issue is of importance to virtually any ecosystem impacted by human activities and by the introduction of exotic or non-indigenous vegetation. The development of a generalized model which would take into account all the diverse factors which affect the health of an ecosystem, particularly which are crucial or indicative factors, would be valuable.
Bibliography – "Aquatic Plants of Palo Verde Park". Crow, Garrett and Rivera, Dora. Uniciencia, p. 71-78, 1986
Flowering Plants of the World, Oxford Press, 1993
Woody Plants of Northwest South America, Gentry, Alwyn, Conservation International, 1993
| . |