ASSESSMENT RUBRIC
|
SKILLS |
POOR 1-2 POINTS |
FAIR 3-4 POINTS |
GOOD 5-6 POINTS
|
TOTAL _____/42 |
|
HYPOTHESIS |
NONE OR INCOMPLETE |
MADE PREDICTION BUT NOT RELEVANT |
RELEVANT |
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN |
NO VARIABLES USED OR DID NOT CONTROL VARIABLES |
MULTIPLE VARIABLES BUT ACCURATELY APPLIED |
ONE VARIABLE SELECTED AND ACCURATELY APPLIED |
|
|
PROCEDURE |
UNCLEAR AND DIFFICULT TO READ |
STEPS MAINLY CLEAR BUT CHANGES IN STRUCTURE WOULD ENHANCE EXPERIMENTAL |
STEPS CLEAR, CONCISE AND EASY TO FOLLOW |
|
|
TREATMENT OF DATA |
NOT ORGANIZED IN TABLE, NO GRAPHS OR INCORRECT GRAPHS |
DATA LOOSELY ORGANIZED IN TABLE, TABLE INCOMPLETE OR INACCURATELY LABELED |
TABLE COMPLETE AND ACCURATELY LABELED |
|
|
CONCLUSION |
NO CONCLUSION DRAWN OR CONCLUSION DID NOT FIT DATA |
CONCLUSIONS ACCURATELY DRAWN AND DID FIT THE DATA |
CONCLUSIONS ACCURATELY DRAWN AND WERE EXTENDED TO REAL WORLD SITUATIONS |
|
|
CORROBORATIVE GROUPS |
SPENT ABOUT HALF THE TIME OFF TASK, UNABLE TO WORK AS A TEAM |
ON TASK MOST OF THE TIME, CONFLICTS RESOLVED |
REMAINED ON TASK, RESOLVED CONFLICTS SMOOTHLY |
|
|
ORAL REPORT |
PRESENTATION LACKED ORGANIZATION, DEMONSTRATED LITTLE CLARITY OF THOUGHT, USE OF INAPPROPRIATE TERMINOLOGY, UNABLE TO RESPOND TO QUESTIONS, READ REPORT |
WELL ORGANIZED PRESENTATION, DEMONSTRATED CLARITY OF THOUGHT, USED CHARTS AND GRAPHS, USED APPROPRIATE TERMINOLOGY, AT LEAST TWO MEMBERS OF GROUPWERE ABLE TO RESPOND TO QUESTIONS |
PRESENTATION WELL ORGANIZED, DEMONSTRATED CLARITY OF THOUGHT INCLUDED EASILY SEEN GRAPHS AND CHARTS TO ENHANCE UNDERSTANDING, ALL MEMBERS WERE ABLE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS, USED APPROPRIATE TERMINOLOGY |