| TEAM 50 | |
| Deanie Anderson | (Oregon) deanieha@open.org |
| Ronald Campbell | (South Dakota) campy@iw.net |
| Connie Cusick | (Montana) |
| Mari Knutson | (Wash) Knutsonm@lynden.wednet.edu |
Hypothesis: There is a direct correlation between soil nitrate concentrations and adjacent downstream nitrate concentrations.
Materials and Equipment:
nitrogen soil test kit
nitrate water test kit
soil core borer
plastic ziploc bags
distilled water
30 meter tape
metric ruler
map of local area
Procedure:
(Follow safety procedures)
1. Using a map of
available area, determine nine test sites with varying
degrees of suspected
nitrate loading.
2. Designate each
site with a number in data book.
3. Go to designated
test site.
4. Select a location
one meter from water's edge.
5. Obtain soil sample
at a depth of 10 centimeters using soil core borer.
6. Test soil per
Hach kit instructions.
7. Record data for
designated site.
8. Select water
test site thirty meters downstream from soil test site.
9. Obtain water
surface sample.
10. Test per kit
instructions.
11. Record
data for designated site.
12. Repeat steps 3 through 1l
for all remaining sites.
Test Kit Procedural Notes:
The Hach
kit that was used tested for nitrogen,
not nitrates. The following assumptions had to be made to convert to nitrates:
*1 acre is equivalent to 2,000,000 pounds of soil (kit reference) * ppm
of nitrogen can be converted to ppm of nitrate by multiplying by 4.4. During
nitrate analysis, two moles of nitrate ions are reduced to one mole of
nitrogen. The mass ratio of two moles of nitrate to one mole of nitrogen
is 124/28 which equals 4.4.
Data Table: Mercer County
Samples
site (see links for site photos)
nitrate conditions
no.
location
water (ppm)
soil
(ppm)
| 1. Princeton -Quaker Rd. | * neg. | neg. |
| 2. Lawrenceville-Medical Ctr. stream | 5 | neg. |
| 3. Washington Xing Pk. Delaware River | 0.5 | neg. |
| 4. Hopewell feeder stream | 1 cloudy | 22 |
| 5. Stonybrook Organic Pond-watershed area | neg. | neg. |
| 6. Washington St. stream | 3.5 | 22 |
| 7. Lake Carnegie-boat house | 1 | neg. |
| 8. Raratan Canal- | 2 | neg. |
| 9. Stonybrook at Princeton entrance | 2.8 | neg. |
Data Analysis:
Note: Series 1 represents soil
nitrate data, while Series 2 represents water nitrate data.
Conclusion: Our
hypothesis was NOT supported by the data collected.
Error Analysis:
Nonspecific sites were used based on types of
bodies of water rather than load sites.
Wet samples may have an impact. Rain preceded
samples 6-9. Soil samples were taken in wet
soils with the exception of site
4 and site 6.
Pond site, although heavy with algae and goose
feces, exhibited low nitrates which could be due
to plant
nitrate absorption.
Extension: This
project is repeatable in any region of the country by students at both
middle school and high school levels. Schools in varying locations can
exchange data.
Further extensions could address:
*Test the relationship between plant growth amounts
and types relative to nitrate levels. Look
for indicator
plant types.
*Test for the relationship of dissolved
oxygen to nitrate levels.
*Test for the relationship between nitrates levels
and presumptive coliform levels.
(test results)
*Test the nitrate content of soils with varying
textures-clay, sandy.
*Test the nitrate content of soils that differ
in moisture concentration.
*Test the nitrate content of soils which contain
differing amounts of organic materials.
*Test for inorganic and organic nitrogen
sources.
Standards: National
Science Standards: Select
Chapter 6, Content Standards for grades 5-8
and 9-12. Also check your individual
district, county and state standards. For an example of coordinated standards
between local ,district, two state levels and higher education levels contact
deanieha@open.org.
References:
Field Manual for Water Quality Monitoring,
Mitchell and Strapp,1996 pp. 60-62
Stonybrook Millstone Watershed Assessment
Guide
See link site references
Hach kit instructions
Inquest Kit instructions
See also Woodrow Wilson Environmental Science
Projects under Nitrate Loading: 3, 11, 14, 20, 25,
and 38
Acknowledgments:
John Sacco-computer
Phi Long-computer
Paul Burchard-computer
Project Green-supplies
Rutgers at Cook College-information
Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation
Environmental Science Institute-NSF funding