|
|
The theme of the 1998 Woodrow Wilson Biology Institute was ``Life in Motion''. The construction of this institute addressed the importance of movement to all organisms and dealt with biological concepts at multiple levels of study. Participants shared classroom activities, interacted with visiting faculty, attended guest lectures, and developed inquiry-based laboratory activities with the help of fellow participants.
Participants presented effective classroom activities which dealt with motion in life. Visiting faculty demonstrated laboratories, themes, or classroom activities that illustrated the importance of motion in animals, plants, fungi, protists and bacteria. Participants also explored how motion was important at multiple levels of study ranging from molecular/cell biology to populations. Guest lecturers stimulated the teachers and enriched their background knowledge.
Our outstanding guest faculty and lecturers included:
Most importantly, our participants worked with each other to develop novel inquiry-based activities that addressed motion at a number of different levels in a variety of organisms. The results of their efforts and experiences have been archived on this web site for your use. The heart of this institute was the work generated by our expert teacher participants. This group features urban, rural, suburban backgrounds; public, private, alternative schools; very high to very low income communities. We think this group represents some of the best of American science teachers. We hope that you will use this information to help create a more effective teaching environment in your classroom. (back to top)
There are many ways to sequence a general high school biology course. Our group researched different sequences to see if there was an overriding sensibility to a particular orientation. We found that there is not a single model that will work in every situation.
We were fascinated by the fact that our host, Princeton University, has split their biology department in two. There is the Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, and also a Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. So at least one world class university has effectively given up trying to teach everything in one department, much less one survey course. This is reflective of the difficulties that scientists have in orienting curriculum, and in covering the many important themes and concepts in a single course. Why, then, are high school teachers expected to do just that?
The "900 pound gorilla" of an answer, of course, is the demands of standardized testing. Whether it's the AP exam, the SAT II Biology, the Regents Exam in New York, or the Golden State Exam in California, we are constantly under the gun to cram more and more into our course. Although the National Science Education Standards recommend a "less breadth, more depth" approach to the curriculum, until there is meaningful assessment reform on a national level there will not likely be a radical transformation of what we teach. The picture is not completely bleak; there is solid support in many states and localities for authentic, performance based assessment, and for more thematic, curricular integration with other scientific disciplines and with other core subjects for students.
With that in mind, we present some different approaches to sequencing and some suggestions as to when each may work. These are certainly not the only ways to orient a course. (back to top)
Click on project title to link to that project page (back to top)
Motion in Cell BiologyAn in vitro experiment was done to determine the affect of insulin and chromium picolinate on the uptake of glucose into a cell. |
The Ins and Outs of Stomata: Gated motionUsing simple procedures and common materials, it is possible to see and measure stomata, the microscopic openings that permit plants to "breathe." Student-centered, inquiry-based lab activities based on these methods are presented. |
Hormones and Plant GrowthOn seed germination, stem elongation, and the influence of hormones on tropist growth. |
Animal Behavior--Grooming Behavior in DrosophilaThis project used the grooming behavior of the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, as a model for an inquiry based laboratory experience. An ethogram of the behavior was constructed, and the behavior quantified with statistical analysis. |
Walking on WaterThis experiment will focus on the effect one type of water pollution, detergents, can have on the locomotion of one aquatic organism, the water strider. |
Sex and Sea Urchins: Developmental BiologyUsing sea urchins or zebra fish as a model, students can investigate the movement of cells within the early stages of development. |
Steppin' OutChallenges to Alexander's Stride Length Hypothesis |
Ants--Masters of the universe?Inquiries into successful adaptations, movements, and migration in ant colonies. |
Playing with PlanariaMemory, movement, and inheritance in tracking planaria behavior. |
Heavy Metal: Copper Uptake in PlantsAn investigation of the ability of plants to remove copper from soils (bioremediation). |
You can contact each teacher by clicking on his or her name; browse a project by clicking on the project title. You can also search for participating teachers.
(Participants: to correct your personal information, please use the Alumni Update Form on this web site.) (back to top)