Egan’s Einsteins Research Journal

 

DAY 1: July 15, 2003

Meeting with Research Team Mentor Mary Egan

Dr. Mary Egan, specialist in ancient DNA and classification of organisms, introduced herself to the team.  Dr. Egan presented her recent findings on tracing haplotypes of the Muntjac, Right Whales and Bowhead Whales to their common ancestors.  Members of our team brainstormed in the fields of Genomics, Evolution and  Phylogenetics for possible research topics. The team will finalized their exact research focus after the collection of specific marine organisms from Jersey Shores. We are privilege to have a mentor with many years of research experience at the renowned American Museum of Natural History in New York City.

 

Day 2: July 16, 2003

Trip to Island Beach State Park In New Jersey for Specimen Collection

This State Park is divided into 3 areas -- northern, central and southern with almost nine-and-a-half-miles of beach front to enjoy. The southern natural area, primarily a wildlife sanctuary, extends almost five miles south to the Barnegat Inlet. We enter the park at the northern side of the Jersey Shores and continued on a dirt trail which led to the coastline. The research team used seine nets, kick nets, buckets, plastic ziplock bags and sterile falcon tubes to collect sample specimens.   

Source: http://www.beachcomber.com/Njshore/Ocean/Islbe/Graphics/isbea.html

 

Some members of the team entered the ocean to collect samples while remaining members were responsible for numbering, cataloguing and temporary storage of samples. We were amazed at the abundant number of diverse organisms collected.

 

The table below lists the 23 specimens and their location.

 Table 1: Specimen Collection Record: Island Beach State Park in New Jersey on July 16, 2003

 

S No.

Specimen Description

Collection Location

Notes

1

Bay Foam

Bayside

 

2

Ocean water

Bayside

 

3

Plant Life from Ocean

Bayside

 

4

Rock and Moss

Bayside

 

5

Clam 1

Bayside

 

6

Clam 2

Bayside

 

7

Plant Life from Ocean

Bayside

 

8

Ocean Water with Whitish Slime

Bayside

 

s

Gladware full of Ocean Water with fish and plant life

Bayside

 

9b

Same collections as 9a separated

Bayside

 

10

Plankton/Ocean Plant Life

Bayside

 

11

Mollusks

Bayside

Water Edge, Beak submerged part way

12

Ocean Water Creatures

Bayside

Possible Invertebrates

13

Mollusks

Bayside

 

14

Snails

Bayside

 

15

Live Crabs with one large claw

Bayside

 

16

Large Dead Crab

Bayside

 

17

Snake, fish, Shrimp,

Bayside

 

18

Large Green Flys that bit Steve

Bayside

 

19

Little White Crabs

Beachside

 

20

Dead Dragonfly lying on beach

Beachside

 

21

Live Fly on beach

Beachside

 

22

2 eels, egg cases, hermit crab, possible sponge, blue crab claw, barnacles, fish, kilfish,

Bayside

 

23

Sea Robin fin clip

Beachside

A nearby fisherman caught fish and brought over to us. We clipped fin then released back to ocean.

 

Day 3: July 17, 2003

In the morning, the group sorted and preserved the samples by adding 95% Ethanol (EtOH) or by freezing to preserve the DNA for future extractions.. We designed a labeling system for the samples and used an Excel

spreadsheet for are recording. Below is the outline of the protocol used for specimen sorting and identification.

 

 Protocol 1: Specimen Identification and Sorting

 

  1. Sorted the specimens into two large groups: Bay Side (BY) and Beach Side (BC).

 

  1. Specimens were placed into subgroups based on similar characteristics.

 

  1. Labels were assigned to the Bay Side organisms starting at BY1 through BY21.  Beach Side organisms were labeled BC1 through BC 4.

 

  1. Microcentrifuge tubes were labeled with group name; date collected, and assigned an identification number.

 

     5.    The DNA specimens were refrigerated for future analysis. 

 

DNA was extracted from all collected samples, following the protocol used for the DNase Easy Kit. Below are photographs of the materials used for the DNA extraction?

 

Day 4: July 18, 2003

The protocol was reviewed for PCR amplification of the 18S gene region. Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA was also covered. The primers used are depicted in Figure 1. All collected samples were subjected to PCR. See the webpage for specific protocol.


                                                               

Figure 1

 I---------------amplified with S2 & 9R------------I

                         18S1F                              S2->            

                        X-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------X

                                                                 <- 5R                                                      <- 18S9R

                         I---amplified with 1F & 5R--I

                         I-----------------------amplified with 1F & 9R--------------------------------I

 

    

 

Day 5: July 19, 2003

The best amplified PCR samples were chosen based upon a single band on the agarose gel. Each selected sample was “gene cleaned”. Gene cleaning is nessasary to remove all PCR reagents from the amplified DNA samples. This step is necessary before running a sequencing reaction on the DNA specimens.

 

Day 6: July 20, 2003

DNA samples were amplified by PCR. A new aliquot of the reverse primer 18S9R was used instead of the old aliquot of the same reverse primer. The conditions for the PCR reactions were the same except for amount of template added.  PCR amplified products that showed a faint band on agarose gels received 5 µl of template. The following spreadsheet outlines the exact contents of each PCR reaction sample.

 

Day 7: July 21, 2003

 The PCR samples were run on agarose gels that we prepared or on E gels bought from Invitrogen.
http://www.invitrogen.com/content.cfm?pageid=3372&CFID=5486285&CFTOKEN=75656301

(The gels with the results for the second half of the 18S region had the best visible bands.  The gels with the results for the entire 18S gene region with the new Aliquot still were not strong. We suspect that this is because the DNA in the samples is degraded. Also, the entire 18S gene region is very long ~1200 to 1600 base pairs)

 

Day 8: July 22, 2003

The group analyzed the bands on the gels with imput from Mary. The best samples were chosen for DNA sequencing. The following spreadsheet was used for the sequencing reactions

 

Day 9: July 23, 2003

The group gene cleaned the samples for DNA sequencing and set up the sequencing reactions (see protocol for sequencing reaction). Mary gave a tutorial on the use of the software program called Sequencher. This program allows for easy editing and alignment of DNA sequences.

 

Day 10: July 24, 2003

The sequencing samples were prepared for loading on a sequencing gel. The following protocol was used to prepare the samples.

In the afternoon the Woodrow Wilson Biology Institute participants traveled to Princeton University for a symposium at The Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics. Speakers were Dr. David Botstein, Dr. Bruce Alberts, Michael Yudell, M.P.H., and Dr. Mary Jeanne Kreek.

 

Day 11: July 25,  2003

The team had good PCR products and yet the sequencing gel did not show any DNA.  We discussed with our mentor all of the possible factors that could have brought this about.  We brainstormed regarding skills, extraction methods,  and gene cleaning etc. our mentors Mary and Rob told us that they needed time to troubleshoot”, to do their own investigating, and to bring their minds together.

In trouble shooting NaI became a target.   All reagents were checked. All  PCR machines and primers were checked  for accuracy.  Because we got good PCR products, we can assume that something was wrong with the reagents used in gene cleaning precipitation.  We had a problem therefore we used a different stock of NaI.(Saturday and Sunday became a day of reflecting, a day to see family and friends, a day for revisiting New York)   Late that evening a sequencing reaction was in progress.

 

Day 12, July 28, 2003

Yes, our results were perfect. The e- gels were beautiful!  Beautiful PCR products! YES!  Yes!  What a beautiful feeling! , The team met for discussion to plan our next phase of analysis.  Dr. Egan gave a hands-on lecture to the team using the software “Sequencher”. Team members utilized the demo program of Sequencher to become familiar with the program. 

 

Day 12: July 29, 2003

Today the team gathered in our meeting room to analyze our data and gels. The team compared the aligned sequences to create a phylogenic tree.  The team assembled a matrix and aligned the sequence in the matrix for phylogenic analysis and produced the phylogenic tree. The rest of the day was spent finishing and polishing the website, the poster, the lesson study, and the research presentation.

 

Home                                                          Back to top